On a few very rare occasions, I’ve tasted foods so unutterably
strange that my only reaction has been irrepressible laughter, an almost
biochemical, nervous reflex as much as an appreciation of whatever undeniable humor
I may have found in the thing itself. Reading Raymond Roussel’s 1914 novel Locus
Solus, I experienced a similar effect; the sheer imaginative complexity of
the book’s conceits sometimes produced such a degree of overstimulation that I
could respond only with reflexive laughter.
My formal introduction to Roussel’s work came last year when
I read his Impressions of Africa. In the first half of that book, a series
of bizarre rituals, contraptions, and performances, unfolding in the central
square of a mythical African republic, adds up to a dazzlingly poetic work that
stretches reality into absurd, amusing, and occasionally macabre shapes. The
second half of the book then gives intricate back-stories for each of these fabrications,
each with an equally mystifying, glorious inventiveness.
Locus Solus largely provides more of the same, but
the elaborations of some of Roussel’s conceits often attain an intricacy to
which those in Impressions of Africa can merely aspire. Roussel
constructs his “novel” upon a plot so thin and utilitarian that he could have
stuck it up with thumbtacks: as the unidentified first person narrator
explains, a group of friends has been invited by the renowned scientist Martial
Canterel to Locus Solus, his estate just outside Paris. Other than that we
never learn who’s in the group, how many they are, or why they’re there.
Rather, Locus Solus leapfrogs such practical matters and plunges immediately
into the wondrously and grotesquely bizarre. Before the group even reaches the villa
on the property, they encounter an earthen statue of “a naked, smiling child,”
standing in a niche upon a pedestal that presents a triptych composed of
incomprehensibly odd, subtly-tinted reliefs melding baffling imagery with the
occasional free-floating word. Canterel engages in a lengthy and outlandish set
of entwined tales, stretching over centuries and from Timbuktu to sea caves off
Bretagne, to explain the curious figure’s history. The group then follows
Canterel to a broad, flat promenade where the scientist demonstrates a
fantastical machine powered entirely by sun and wind. Directed by extraordinarily
precise computational algorithms predicting the speed and direction of the
slightest of breezes over a ten-day period, the machine executes a mosaic on the
ground by placing human teeth, in all their varieties of discoloration, into a
pattern illustrating a scene from a Scandinavian folkloric legend. Next comes a
creation first glimpsed from a distance, a “monstrous jewel, two metres high by
three wide, curved into the form of an ellipse [which gives] out, under the
full radiance of the sun, an almost unbearable lustre, flashing in all
directions” and emitting “vague strains of music.” Within this diamond, filled
with a shimmering clear liquid, various scenes reveal themselves: the music
emanates from the flowing blonde hair of a smiling young woman standing within
the diamond, apparently able to breathe easily in the hyper-oxygenated liquid; an
angry Atlas repeatedly drops and kicks at his globe; a figure of Voltaire is
seen experiencing a moment of doubt about his atheism as he spies a young girl deep
in prayer; the “internal remains” of the face of Danton, reduced to a thin
skein of fibers, mouths unheard words in response to an unseen stimulus; a “pink
and entirely hairless” Siamese cat (Khóng Dêk Lèn - surely one of the most
memorable cats in literature) gaily swims about while a whimsical interpretation
of Apollo and his chariot of fire, composed of a team of colored seahorses
pulling, via some mysterious magnetic attraction, a round mass luminous like
the sun, engages in a (sea)horse race. The glowing mass, it turns out, is Sauternes,
which in contact with this aqua-micans
coalesces and takes on an extraordinary glow (a genially exaggerated version of
the chemical magic that occurs when water is added to pastis, for instance; this
Sauternes in aqua-micans is a cocktail
I’d certainly like to try). Next, the group passes slowly along a long transparent
wall behind which elaborate tableaux
vivants are being enacted – or rather, tableaux
morts, since in each scene a reanimated corpse relives the most crucial
moment of his or her life, thanks to Canterel’s ingenious invention of the
chemical substances vitalium, resurrectine, and erythrite. Relatives flock to Locus Solus in hopes of gaining,
through these recreations, an understanding of the loss of their loved ones.
These are but a few of the strange marvels of Locus Solus;
as in Impressions of Africa, one story begets another, and it’s easy to
lose track of where the first story began. Roussel nests tales within tales,
concatenations that seem capable of leading one along infinitely (and tediously
at times), like the reflections in facing mirrors, but he regularly sticks in a
tack to reorient his narrative to the group visit to Locus Solus. His inventions
– prose conceptions of creations that would put most contemporary conceptual
art to shame - again bridge science and art, with a strong emphasis on writing,
music, drama and painting as well as hybrid biological and mechanical
mechanisms (“Only an animal, at once living and uncomprehending, would be able
to give the required degree of unexpectedness to the performance”). Any artist,
tinkering inventor or bright, open-minded bioengineer should be inspired.
The propagation of these inventive, poetic scenes lies in
Roussel’s “procès.” Beginning with one set of words linked by the preposition “à,”
Roussel would pair it with another set of similarly linked homonyms of those
words. An example given by Roussel in his book on his own methodology, How I
Wrote Certain of My Books, is “mou à raille” (mou – a wimpy, soft person :
raille – like “the raillery heaped upon a lazy student by his comrades”) paired
with “mou à rail” (mou – a culinary dish made of calves lungs : rail – a
railroad line). The operation of these odd pairings, something akin to the
mutations resulting from frameshifting of DNA, generates the nonsensical associations
Roussel then takes and amplifies into his intricate constructions. The above
example shows up in Impressions of Africa in the form of a cart that
runs upon a track made of calves’ lungs. (The tremendous creative and humorous
potential of this kind of homonymy is evident in an accessible, charming work
employing something similar to Roussel’s method, Luis d’Antin van Rooten’s Mots
d’Heures: Gousses, Rames, in which French homophones are used to create
absurdist versions of the English lines that make up Mother Goose Rhymes
– or, for another example, in this irreverent version of the Soviet national anthem).
But Roussel’s process is only an initial, generative tool to
help fabricate his creations, and hardly explains the prodigious imagination on
display in his work. He then performs a further textual operation, similar to
the surrealist game Exquisite Corpse (wherein a drawing made by one person on
half of a folded sheet is completed by another on the other half, with the
second able to see only minimal, connecting traces of the first’s design) by
again inventing for each his conceits an explanation at least as fantastic as
what it sets out to explain. In Locus Solus, Roussel collapses these
concepts and their explanations into discrete chapters, each consecrated to one
of Canterel’s contrivances as the group moves about the estate. In one such back-story,
the mirror-like fingernails that play a critical role in the sudden collapse
into insanity of a woman seen in one of the tableaux
morts are explained in detail as a fashionable cosmetic treatment in which
the nails are first removed, made transparent, provided a reflective tinned backing
like the metal substrate on old mirrors, then replaced on the fingers (I’m
surprised that I’ve yet to encounter this particular body manipulation on the
streets of San Francisco).
Considering the games with homonyms at the heart of
Roussel’s process, one might wonder if reading him in English entails a greater
than ordinary loss in translation. But even educated French readers would be
unlikely to divine the linguistic origins of Roussel’s ideas solely from his
texts, and these uncommon concepts almost certainly taste as exhilaratingly
strange in English as they do in French. What may come through of Roussel’s
homonym games, though, is a palpable sense of drifting through an infinitely
curved universe of words, a dream-like echo space in which language generates
and regenerates itself. It’s mesmerizing, for the most part. And did I mention
that “a cheerful dinner” is promised to the guests at the end? I feel almost
cheated in not getting to sit down in the villa of Locus Solus to enjoy that meal.
This sounds mischievously disruptive of good sense. I just finished reading a Cape Verdean novel that may owe something to Roussel, it's also as bizarre and full of stories within stories while making very little sense. Didn't Nabokov admire Roussel?
ReplyDeleteAlso, thanks for that link! I can no longer listen to the hymn and not hear the French words underneath! It's amazing. Oh, and how lovely to hear the main theme of the Command and Conquer videogame at the end, I used to love it when I was a kid. I had a great vocation for being a world dictator.
Miguel - I'm so glad you appreciated that link. I came very close to cutting it out as a bit too tangential, but I agree that it's amazing (and impossible to get out of one's head).
DeleteWhat is the Cape Verdean novel (not that I expect it to be available in translation)?
I don't know about the influence on Nabokov, but it would not surprise me, especially after reading Pale Fire.
It's called No Inferno, by Arménio Vieira. More details in a few months.
DeleteI have a certain fascination with the bizarre when it is paired with true creativity. It sounds as if one needs to have such an appreciation to get anything out of Roussel.
ReplyDeleteThanks for highlighting this work, as I do appreciate such things I may give it a try.
Sadly, though my wife reads fluent French, she would likely not appreciate this style. It is a pity, as I would be really curious to know how the work really would come off in its native language.
Brian - As I tried to convey in writing about Impressions of Africa, I actually think Roussel is a lot more accessible than he at first may seem. He's rather a kid at play, and if one approaches him at such, the "bizarre" in his work doesn't seem so off-putting, even, I'd wager, to people who wouldn't normally go for such things.
DeleteI guess I'll have to sit down with Roussel at some point if both you and Aira are such big fans of his. I guess...his games really do sound fun, though (although I must admit I felt burned by Perec's A Void--at least in translation).
ReplyDeleteRichard - I think you'd appreciate Roussel. I don't know that I'm a "fan" - the purity of the process and the absence of anything other than observation on the part of the audience leave me a bit…I don't know, unsatisfied? But I did not expect to enjoy these two books as much as I did, and the creations are of such a deliriously high degree of imagination that I can't help but be impressed, and stimulated in an all too rare way.
Delete