I’ve been cordially
invited to join The Savage Detectives reading challenge. I accepted of course, albeit with slight
reluctance, and not just due to time constraints (I’m late, I’m sorry). I’ve been
both fascinated and vaguely irritated by the previous works of Roberto Bolaño
that I’ve read - in order: Distant Star, By Night in Chile, 2666,
Nazi Literature in the Americas, Antwerp – good heavens, is it
that many already? There’s something about him that’s prickled on a purely personal
(visceral?) level, and I’ve been unable to put my finger on it, despite there
being many candidates: he challenges his readers and makes us feel uneasy; he
can be showy and self-conscious in his intellectualism; his world is so
concentrated on the minutiae of writers and writing that one can feel left outside
of some private club (or private joke); he can indulge in literary games with a
fervor bordering on adolescent excess; he can even come across as tinged by a homophobic
and slightly patriarchal streak. To
make matters worse and better at the same time, he can appear to do and be the
opposite of all of these things as well. Anyway, none or all of this seemed to
explain my light irritation. Maybe too it was that I’d been raised on a diet
consisting of an excess of Beat literature, provoking something akin to an
allergy, and Bolaño had clearly dined on a lot of the same. I don’t know. But I
went into The Savage Detectives with a sense almost of duty, expecting
to bear, throughout my reading of it, this same mild prickliness. Alas, The
Savage Detectives smashed my petty, hypochondriacal presumptions to bits.
Where does one begin to
get a grip on this work, or to avoid sticking to it, like a desert burr,
wherever one tries to grab hold? How not to be reductionist, when there’s so
much going on here that focusing on one aspect makes the others go out of
focus, like trying to pin down a floater in one’s retina, or tugging at one
thread and feeling the whole ensemble quiver with the possibility of
destruction?
Perhaps it would be
helpful (I really don’t know) to briefly summarize the arc of the novel’s
three-part structure, which begins in Mexico City with a series of diary entries
by 17-year old aspiring poet Juan Garcia Madero that stretch from Dia de los
Muertos to New Year’s Eve, 1975; gets interrupted by 350 pages of testimonials
(recordings?) made over a period of 20 years by some 50-odd narrators, all
piecing together the travels and travails of Arturo Belano and Ulises Lima,
leaders of the Visceral Realist poetry movement Garcia Madero has been invited
to join; then finally returns to Garcia Madero’s diary from New Year’s Day
through February 15, 1976, detailing a journey that began at the end of part
one with Garcia Madero, Belano, Lima, and Lupe, a young prostitute, together in
a borrowed Impala, heading to the Sonora desert both in flight from Lupe’s
violent pimp and in search of the elusive, mysterious, lost poet of the
original Visceral Realists of a previous generation, Cesárea Tinajero. That’s a
rather long sentence; this is a rather long book.
The broad sweep of it encompasses
generations of poets. Real and imagined, appearing and disappearing, they zing
about like electrons in a vast chamber, from Garcia Madero to his heroes Belano
and Lima to the target of their own rebellion, Octavio Paz, and to their lost
hero Cesárea Tinajero, from the most famous to the most obscure, to all of
Mexico’s poets and, radiating outward in straight lines, waves, and jagged zigzags
to those of South America and the rest of the world. Like Frederic Prokosch’s The
Asiatics, The Savage Detectives scurries around the globe with an
astonishing ability to delve into the particulars of place. And if The
Asiatics represented a new sort of “internationalist” novel, then The
Savage Detectives maybe represents a new sort of “Google-ist” novel in its
astounding array of details. It’s also an experimental work. Aside from the
consecutive dates on Garcia Madero’s diary entries, time too follows myriad
crooked directions, flashing backward and forward. Multiple stories intertwine
and overlap. In addition to the scores of narrators, multitudes of literary
forms are used to tell these multitudes of stories (which, for all of Bolaño ’s
experimentalism, reveal a terrific storytelling ability and a sometimes surpassing
tenderness).
So what’s it all about? Good
lord. Literature. Biography and autobiography, youthful exuberance, literary
aspiration and literary longevity. Literary pretension and literary humility. High
and low culture. Intellectualism and anti-intellectualism and violence. Exile
and exile’s return. Reliable friends and unreliable narrators. Rebellion and
acquiescence. Interrogation and detective work. Writers who seek fame, writers
who muddle through, writers who disappear, writers who are disappeared. Mexican
painter Dr. Atl figures into the novel, though his most famous creation
doesn’t, perhaps to encourage us to think of it ourselves: like his astonishing
curtain in Mexico City’s Bellas Artes theater, The Savage Detectives
glints and sparkles and reflects like two tons of glass forming an image from a
million different pieces (would that an image of this stunning object had been
used for the book’s cover).
Bolaño has discovered a form for his book that
admits of almost anything. It’s as though he’s simply reached around the back
of the novel – while everyone looked on in horror and trepidation (hey, you
can’t do that!) - and found the hidden spring that explodes the locks, opening the
form to its capacity to encompass and absorb anything, a kind of gravitational
energy like a black hole, but one in which everything swallowed remains visible
- and visceral. This is not simple “metafiction,” which, in comparison to what Bolaño
is doing, seems to be just playing
around the edges. Rather, for Bolaño , the key to the treasure is the treasure.
By going directly to literature itself, into questions of what literature is
and does, its possibilities and limitations, who writes and why, does any of it
matter and why does it seem to matter so much, he turns the entirety of
literary enterprise inside out to reveal its motivations, literary influences,
schools and movements and attitudes, events in the poets’ lives and those of the
poets’ associates, hero worship and jealousies and internecine fighting among
writers (sometimes literalized, as in a duel fought on the beach between writer
and critic, or in a physical altercation between Belano and his girlfriend, or
more humorously, the orbital conjunctions of Ulises Lima and Octavio Paz as
they perambulate in a park). In other words, perhaps, to reveal the visceral
reality of literary enterprise?
Literature often (if not
usually) involves a writer’s effort to erase traces of him or herself. In The
Savage Detectives, this process is taken apart literally. As readers we’re
detectives piecing together the lives of Arturo Belano and Ulises Lima (not to
mention the sense and sensibility of the whole work), while we’re also reading
about characters trying to piece together, like detectives, the life of a
vanished poet, whose sole surviving poem is a work without words, itself quite
literally a mere trace, one that pushes the limits of poetry to where it borders
on - “poof” - just disappearing, as does another such wordless
poem-object, with magically strange, majestic humor and poignancy at the end of
the novel. And finally, we’re also reading about the pursuit of these detective
poets by “savage detectives” of another order, Lupe’s pimp and the potential
for violence that he brings with him. For as a counterbalance to all this
literary effort, to this “gang” of Visceral Realists, there’s a dead weight of destructive
violence inhabiting the space around the desire to create, where in the end (in
yet another of Bolaño ’s comic/serious manifestations of the literal) it’s
poets vs. thugs.
The Savage Detectives references literally hundreds (if not thousands)
of poets, poetic terms and forms, movements and incidents in the history of
poetry, from the ephemeral to the established to the imaginary. Some of this avalanche
of particulars seems like name-dropping, but one of the astonishing things
about Bolaño is the extent to which he seems to have absorbed, like someone
with a photographic soul, everything he ever read or heard about literature,
and is able to recapitulate it with its original sense intact, as well as with
his reinvention of it, as well as
with all the resonances it might have for a reader. In the novel’s lengthy
laundry lists of poetic terms and forms, of types of experimental writing, and
above all, of writers themselves, you sometimes come to doubt that Bolaño knows
what he’s talking about; then you shudder at the possibility, then probability,
then near certainty that he does (whatever else The Savage Detectives
may be, it’s an astonishing phenomenon of intellect). Bolaño even anticipates
your doubts. When Amadeo Salvatierra reads out of Manuel Maples Arce’s
“Directory of the Avant-Garde,” an epic catalog of hundreds of names, he
interrupts his reading of the list occasionally to interject things like,
“Look…all we’re getting is last names now, “ or “Here I think Manuel was just
pulling names out of a hat.” Naturally one wonders if Bolaño is doing the same
thing.
Not that it would matter
terribly if he was; Bolaño knows
where his knowledge matters and where it doesn’t. Everything in The Savage
Detectives works to raise questions and play with those questions,
constantly engaging the reader in puzzles and games. Some of them are light-hearted
and gossamer thin, while others are magisterial re-workings of literary
histories into his own imagination, as in the scene of the duel on the beach which
flashes for a moment like a perfectly-tuned recreation of the tone and setting
of Meursault’s fatal encounter on the beach in Camus’ The Stranger - before
it takes off in a completely unexpected direction. While The Savage
Detectives certainly rewards readers for the knowledge they bring to it
(and makes what we don’t know seem a desert we could travel without end), there’s
a refreshing lack of elitism and condescension in his gaming, which is also
shot through with humor, from visual puns that would amuse a child to laugh-out
loud funny intellectual conceits. One of the funniest of these involves one of Arturo Belano’s former lovers, female body builder Maria Teresa Solsona
Ribot, the flabbiness of whose literary taste is in inverse proportion to the
tightness of her muscles. While discussing Stanley Kubrick’s “The Shining,” in
particular the novel that the writer played by Jack Nicholson writes as he
sinks into madness, Belano reminds Ribot that it consists of a single line –
“All work and no play make Jack a dull boy” – 500 pages of it written every
possible way. He casually notes to her that “It might have been a good novel.”
At Ribot’s incredulity that such a creation could be “a good novel,” he
replies, “That shows a lack of respect for the reader.” It’s a suggestion to Bolaño ’s own
readers that he respects our abilities - and an instruction that we should have
fun as well.
But Bolaño ’s games are
more than just idle; they’re also rooted in something serious, as when a
character notes that South American poets have a reason to be serious, given
that most have spent time in prison for political reasons, and as further underscored
by Bolaño ’s engagement with real world violence, such as the Tlatelolco
massacre (or the heinous Juarez serial killings in 2666). As though to
remind us that one can play literary games in fiction, but not to the extent
that they simply become fiction’s sole, self-reflexive object, Bolaño culls
something both playful and meaningful out of literature’s weighty accretion of
texts and movements and history. Of the many writers who weave in and out of Bolaño
’s narratives, perhaps the most notable is Rimbaud, who haunts (should I have
said “infects”?) The Savage Detectives. Using that Arthur
Rimbaud/Roberto Bolaño hybrid,
Arturo Belano, Bolaño interlaces
the actual horror of the civil war in Liberia with a fictionalized version of
the disappearance of the poet into Africa, just as Rimbaud appeared to give up
poetry and vanish there, trailed through literary history by rumors and
suppositions.
Of course the
disappearance of a poet, trailed through literary history by rumors and suppositions,
is also at the heart of the central plot of The Savage Detectives. Why
does Cesárea Tinajero disappear? As in some lost chapter out of Silences,
Tillie Olsen’s great book about literary disappearing acts, we learn that
Cesárea’s disappearance is rooted in her defense of another young female poet,
Encarnación Guzman, who has been ridiculed by male members of the earlier
movement of Visceral Realists. Angered by their patronizing behavior, Tinajero
refuses to come to their meetings again. She and Encarnación instead become
even faster friends. And then after Encarnación vanishes into marriage, Cesárea
herself vanishes, becoming magnified and distorted in legend, seen here, maybe
seen there, thin in one recollection, fat in the next, imagined by Amadeo Salvatierra
as “a spot moving along an endless ribbon.” Or perhaps a square along that
ribbon. Or a sailboat. We’re again
in one of Bolaño’s games.
For those willing to
play along, The Savage Detectives will likely have generous readers for
a long time to come. While the traces of his alter egos may lead off into the
world’s cities, into the Mexican desert, into the violence of Africa’s wars,
and even right out the window, Bolaño’s own traces are in little danger of
disappearing thanks to this glittering, sprawling, howling, ingenious, generous
book, one powerful enough to bring even Cesárea Tinajero back from oblivion.
